← Back to Search
Patricia Bensetler v. Bolton, Town of - Office of the Town Clerk (SPR 20240779)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 03-13-2024
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20240779 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Patricia Bensetler concerning records held by Bolton, Town of - Office of the Town Clerk, opened 03-13-2024. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20240779
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Patricia Bensetler
- Date Opened
- 03-13-2024
- Date Closed
- 03-27-2024
- Date Request Submitted
- 02-14-2024
- Response Provided Date
- 02-22-2024
- Processing Fees Charged
- 0.00
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records March 27, 2024 SPR24/0779 Pamela Powell Town Clerk Town of Bolton 663 Main Street Bolton, MA 01740 Dear Ms. Powell: I have received the petition of Patricia Bensetler appealing the response of the Town of Bolton (Town) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On February 14, 2024, Ms. Bensetler requested: [1.] All the paperwork needed to approve, and the approval of the work at the [specified address] bridge to install the flow device and all emails supporting that decision[; and] [2.] Any photos taken to support that decision. The Town responded on February 22, 2024. Unsatisfied with the Town’s response, Ms. Bensetler petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR24/0779, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Pamela Powell SPR24/0779 Page 2 March 27, 2024 must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. The Town’s February 22nd response In its February 22, 2024 response, the Town asserted “[w]e are in the process of reviewing our files for the information requested.” Timeliness in providing records G. L. c. 66, § 10(b) provides, in pertinent part, that if the magnitude or difficulty of the request unduly burdens the other responsibilities of the agency or municipality such that the agency or municipality cannot provide records within 10 business days, the agency or municipality must inform the requestor in writing within 10 business days. With respect to the timeframe to produce responsive records, the written response shall: identify a reasonable timeframe in which the agency or municipality shall produce the public records sought; provided, that for an agency, the timeframe shall not exceed 15 business days following the initial receipt of the request for public records and for a municipality the timeframe shall not exceed 25 business days following the initial receipt of the request for public records; and provided further, that the requestor may voluntarily agree to a response date beyond the timeframes set forth herein. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vi). Where it appears Ms. Bensetler submitted her request on February 14, 2024, it is unclear why the Town has not provided the responsive records. The duty to comply with request for records extends to those records that exist and are in the possession, custody, or control of the custodian of records at the time of the request. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a)(ii). Custodians are expected to use their superior knowledge of the records in their custody to assist requestors in obtaining the desired information. See 950 C.M.R. 32.04(5); see also G. L. c. 66, § 10(a) (records must be provided without unreasonable delay). Conclusion Accordingly, the Town is ordered to provide Ms. Bensetler with a response to her request provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law, and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of the response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Ms. Bensetler may appeal the substantive nature of the Town’s response within ninety (90) days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Pamela Powell SPR24/0779 Page 3 March 27, 2024 Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Patricia Bensetler