← Back to Search
Anonymous Requester v. Ashland, Town of - Office of the Town Clerk (SPR 20240859)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Public records appeal decision · Filed 03-21-2024
ClosedTime PetitionDecision
SPR 20240859 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Anonymous Requester concerning records held by Ashland, Town of - Office of the Town Clerk, opened 03-21-2024. Type: Time Petition. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Public records appeal decision.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20240859
- Case Type
- Time Petition
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Anonymous Requester
- Date Opened
- 03-21-2024
- Date Closed
- 03-27-2024
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records March 27, 2024 SPR24/0859 Cindy Livingstone Town Clerk Town of Ashland 101 Main Street Ashland, MA 01721 Dear Ms. Livingstone: On March 21, 2024, this office received your petition on behalf of the Town of Ashland (Town) seeking an extension of time to produce records. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c); G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4). As required by law, it is my understanding that the Town furnished a copy of the petition to the requestor. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c); G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv)(2). On March 11, 2024, the requestor sought “all invoices received from [a specified company] covering the period 1/1/2021 to 3/8/2024, which involve one or more of the following services, exclusively:” [1.] Professional services of an engineering nature associated with research, planning, development, design, investigations, inspections, tests, evaluations, consultations, program management, value engineering, construction, alteration, or repair of real property. [2.] Studies, investigations, surveying and mapping, soil tests, construction phase services, drawing reviews, evaluations, consultations, comprehensive planning, program management, conceptual designs, plans and specifications, soils engineering, cost estimates or programs, preparation of drawings, plans, or specifications, supervision or administration of a construction contract, construction management or scheduling, preparation of operation and maintenance manuals, master plans, or cost estimating. Petition for an Extension of Time Under the Public Records Law, upon a showing of good cause, the Supervisor of Records (Supervisor) may grant a single extension to an agency not to exceed 20 business days and a single extension to a municipality not to exceed 30 business days. In determining whether there One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Cindy Livingstone SPR24/0859 Page 2 March 27, 2024 has been a showing of good cause, the Supervisor shall consider, but shall not be limited to considering: (i) the need to search for, collect, segregate or examine records; (ii) the scope of redaction required to prevent unlawful disclosure; (iii) the capacity or the normal business hours of operation of the agency or municipality to produce the request without the extension; (iv) efforts undertaken by the agency or municipality in fulfilling the current request and previous requests; (v) whether the request, either individually or as part of a series of requests from the same requestor, is frivolous or intended to harass or intimidate the agency or municipality; and (vi) the public interest served by expeditious disclosure. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c). If the Supervisor determines that the request is part of a series of contemporaneous requests that are frivolous or designed to intimidate or harass, and the requests are not intended for the broad dissemination of information to the public about actual or alleged government activity, the Supervisor may grant a longer extension or relieve the agency or municipality of its obligation to provide copies of the records sought. Id. The filing of a petition does not affect the requirement that a Records Access Officer (RAO) must provide an initial response to a requestor within ten business days after receipt of a request for public records. 950 C.M.R. 36.06(4)(b). Current Petition In its petition, the Town requests “an extension per G.L. c. 66 §10(c) of an additional 10 business days.” In support of its request, the Town states that “given the time needed to search and review responsive records for this, it is estimated that it will take the Town longer than the 10 business days allowed by the Public Records Law.” Conclusion Based on the information provided in the Town’s March 21st petition, I find it is unnecessary to opine on the Town’s extension request. In this case, the Town intends to provide responsive records within twenty five (25) business days of the receipt of the request, as allowed in G. L. c. 66 § 10(b)(vi). See G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vi) (records access officer may identify a reasonable timeframe for producing records not to exceed 25 business days following initial receipt of the request). Please note, the requestor has the right to seek judicial review of this decision by commencing a civil action in the appropriate superior court. See G. L. c. 66, §§ 10(c), 10(d)(iv)(4), 10A(c). Cindy Livingstone SPR24/0859 Page 3 March 27, 2024 Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Requestor