← Back to Search
Steve Snow v. Hopkinton, Town of (SPR 20241945)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to comply within 10 days · Filed 07-09-2024
ClosedFee PetitionPetitioner Won
SPR 20241945 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Steve Snow concerning records held by Hopkinton, Town of, opened 07-09-2024. Type: Fee Petition. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to comply within 10 days.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20241945
- Case Type
- Fee Petition
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Steve Snow
- Custodian
- Hopkinton, Town of
- Date Opened
- 07-09-2024
- Date Closed
- 07-11-2024
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records July 11, 2024 SPR24/1945 Connor B. Degan Town Clerk Town of Hopkinton 18 Main Street Hopkinton, MA 01748 Dear Mr. Degan: On July 9, 2024, this office received your petition on behalf of the Town of Hopkinton (Town) requesting permission to charge for time spent segregating or redacting responsive records. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c); G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4). As required by law, it is my understanding that the Town furnished a copy of the petition to the requestor, Steve Snow. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c); G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv)(2). On June 20, 2024, Mr. Snow requested “[a]ll records mentioning [my] name and/or [my] report of a criminal complaint that [I] filed with the Hopkinton Police Department (hereinafter “HPD”) on January 30, 2024 (which complaint shall be referred to herein as my “Complaint”) around 4:30 PM.” Petition to assess fees – Municipalities The Supervisor may approve a petition from a municipality to charge for time spent segregating or redacting or to charge in excess of $25 per hour, if the Supervisor determines that 1) the request is for a commercial purpose or 2) the fee represents an actual and good faith representation by the municipality to comply with the request. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). In rendering such a decision, the Supervisor is required to consider the following: a) the public interest served by limiting the cost of public access to the records; b) the financial ability of the requestor to pay the additional or increased fees; and c) any other relevant extenuating circumstances. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). The statute sets out a two-prong test for determining whether the Supervisor may approve a municipality’s petition to allow the municipality to charge for time spent segregating or redacting records or to charge in excess of $25 an hour for the provision of public records. The first prong is whether the request for records was made for a commercial purpose. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). It is my understanding that this request was not made for a commercial purpose. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Connor B. Degan SPR24/1945 Page 2 July 11, 2024 The second prong of the test is whether the fee represents an actual and good faith representation by the municipality to comply with the request. The Supervisor must consider 1) if the fee is necessary such that the request could not have been prudently completed without the redaction or segregation or fee in excess of $25 per hour; 2) the amount of the fee is reasonable; and 3) the fee is not designed to limit, deter or prevent access to requested public records. Id. Petitions seeking a waiver of statutory limits to fees assessed to segregate and/or redact public records must be made within ten business days after receipt of a request for public records. 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4)(g). Fee Estimates – Municipalities A municipality may assess a reasonable fee for the production of a public record except those records that are freely available for public inspection. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d). The fees must reflect the actual cost of complying with a particular request. Id. A maximum fee of five cents ($.05) per page may be assessed for a black and white single or double-sided photocopy of a public record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(i). Municipalities may not assess a fee for the first 2 (two) hours of employee time to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce the record or records requested unless the municipality has 20,000 people or less. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iii). Where appropriate, municipalities may include as part of the fee an hourly rate equal to or less than the hourly rate attributed to the lowest paid employee who has the necessary skill required to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce a record requested, but the fee shall not be more than $25 per hour. Id. However, municipalities may charge more than $25 per hour if such rate is approved by the Supervisor of Records under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). A fee shall not be assessed for time spent segregating or redacting records unless such segregation or redaction is required by law or approved by the Supervisor of Records under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). See G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iii); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4). Conclusion Accordingly, in light of the fact that the Town has not demonstrated that it submitted its petition within ten business days after receipt of the request, permission to charge for segregation or redaction that is not required by law cannot be granted. 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4)(g). Please note, however, this determination does not preclude the Town from charging for segregation and redaction that is required by law. Connor B. Degan SPR24/1945 Page 3 July 11, 2024 Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Steve Snow Emily A. Meehan, Esq., Harrington Heep, LLP. Bryan Bertram, Esq., Harrington Heep, LLP.