MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Timothy W. Goodrich v. Ipswich, Town of (SPR 20242521)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 09-06-2024

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20242521 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Timothy W. Goodrich concerning records held by Ipswich, Town of, opened 09-06-2024. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20242521
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Timothy W. Goodrich
Custodian
Ipswich, Town of
Date Opened
09-06-2024
Date Closed
09-19-2024

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records September 19, 2024 SPR24/2521 Amy Akell Town Clerk Town of Ipswich 25 Green Street Ipswich, MA 01938 Dear Ms. Akell: I have received the petition of Timothy W. Goodrich appealing the response of the Town of Ipswich (Town) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On August 21, 2024, Mr. Goodrich requested “the meeting slides from yesterday’s meeting.” On September 5, 2024, the Town provided a response. Unsatisfied with the Town’s response, Mr. Goodrich petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR24/2455, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Amy Akell SPR24/2521 Page 3 September 19, 2024 If there are any fees associated with a response, a written good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. The Town’s September 5th Response In its September 5, 2024 response, the Town stated, “[w]e have gaps in labor and process in planning. I am not in planning or connected to the 3A Task Force but I have emailed [an identified Town representative] for the 8/20 slides.” Timeliness in providing records G. L. c. 66, § 10(b) provides, in pertinent part, that if the magnitude or difficulty of the request unduly burdens the other responsibilities of the agency or municipality such that the agency or municipality cannot provide records within 10 business days, the agency or municipality must inform the requestor in writing within 10 business days. With respect to the timeframe to produce responsive records, the written response shall: identify a reasonable timeframe in which the agency or municipality shall produce the public records sought; provided, that for an agency, the timeframe shall not exceed 15 business days following the initial receipt of the request for public records and for a municipality the timeframe shall not exceed 25 business days following the initial receipt of the request for public records; and provided further, that the requestor may voluntarily agree to a response date beyond the timeframes set forth herein. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vi). Where Mr. Goodrich submitted his request on August 21, 2024, and the Town has not provided responsive records, nor cited an exemption for withholding records, I find the Town has not met its burden in responding to the request in accordance with G. L. c. 66, § 10(b). Consequently, the Town must provide an estimated date as to when it intends to complete the search and provide the responsive records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a) (records must be provided without unreasonable delay). Conclusion Accordingly, the Town is ordered to provide Mr. Goodrich with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of the response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Mr. Goodrich may appeal the substantive nature of the Town’s response within ninety (90) days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1).

Amy Akell SPR24/2521 Page 3 September 19, 2024 Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Timothy W. Goodrich