MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

David Webb v. Worcester, City of - Law Department (SPR 20242528)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 09-06-2024

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20242528 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by David Webb concerning records held by Worcester, City of - Law Department, opened 09-06-2024. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20242528
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
David Webb
Custodian
Worcester, City of - Law Department
Date Opened
09-06-2024
Date Closed
09-19-2024

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records September 19, 2024 SPR24/2528 Michael Vigneux Records Access Officer Law Department 455 Main Street, Room 303 Worcester, MA 01608 Dear Mr. Vigneux: I have received the petition of David Webb appealing the response of the City of Worcester (City) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On June 27, 2024, Mr. Webb requested, “[r]eports initiated by a shotspotter notification from the month of January 2024[.]” The City responded on July 15, 2024 and August 5, 2024. Unsatisfied with the City’s responses, and claiming not to have received responsive records, Mr. Webb petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR24/2528, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832 • Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Michael Vigneux SPR24/2528 Page 2 September 19, 2024 custodian must provide the responsive records. The City’s Responses In its July 15, 2024 response, the City advised that it “[required] additional time, up to 15 business days, to complete the work required to fulfill your request.” In its August 5, 2024 response, the City stated, “[t]he requested reports have been located and are being prepared for disclosure. Review and redaction of witness information is required due to safety and security concerns. You can expect to receive the requested records within the next two business days.” G. L. c. 66, § 10(b) provides, in pertinent part, that if the magnitude or difficulty of the request unduly burdens the other responsibilities of the agency or municipality such that the agency or municipality cannot provide records within 10 business days, the agency or municipality must inform the requestor in writing within 10 business days. With respect to the timeframe to produce responsive records, the written response shall: identify a reasonable timeframe in which the agency or municipality shall produce the public records sought; provided, that for an agency, the timeframe shall not exceed 15 business days following the initial receipt of the request for public records and for a municipality the timeframe shall not exceed 25 business days following the initial receipt of the request for public records; and provided further, that the requestor may voluntarily agree to a response date beyond the timeframes set forth herein. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vi). Where Mr. Webb’s request was originally submitted on June 27, 2024, and the City has not provided responsive records, I find the City has not met its burden in responding to the request in accordance with G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vi). Accordingly, I find the City must provide an estimated date as to when it expects to complete its review and provide the requested records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a) (records must be provided without unreasonable delay). Conclusion Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide Mr. Webb with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of the response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us.

Michael Vigneux SPR24/2528 Page 3 September 19, 2024 Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: David Webb Janice Thompson, Esq.