← Back to Search
Rebecca Raymond v. New Bedford, City of - Police Department (SPR 20242617)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 09-18-2024
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20242617 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Rebecca Raymond concerning records held by New Bedford, City of - Police Department, opened 09-18-2024. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20242617
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Rebecca Raymond
- Date Opened
- 09-18-2024
- Date Closed
- 09-30-2024
- Response Provided Date
- 10-11-2024
- Processing Fees Charged
- 0.00
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Time to Comply
- 9 Business Days
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records September 30, 2024 SPR24/2617 Chief Paul Oliveira New Bedford Police Chief New Bedford Police Department 871 Rockdale Avenue New Bedford, MA 02740 Dear Chief Oliveira: I have received the petition of Rebecca Raymond appealing the response of the New Bedford Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On September 14, 2024, Ms. Raymond requested, “any and all police reports regarding myself [and two other named individuals].” The Department responded on September 16, 2024. Unsatisfied with the Department’s response, Ms. Raymond appealed, and this case, SPR24/2617, was opened as a result. Status of Requestor In her appeal petition, Ms. Raymond states, “I am unaware of any reason that I would have to go through third district Court for access to these reports where I am listed as the victim.” Please note that the reason for which a requestor seeks access to or a copy of a public record does not afford any greater right of access to the requested information than other persons in the general public. The Public Records Law does not distinguish between requestors. Access to a record pursuant to the Public Records Law rests on the content of the record and not the circumstances of the requestor. See Bougas v. Chief of Police of Lexington, 371 Mass. 59, 64 (1976). Accordingly, Ms. Raymond’s status as the victim in the requested record will play no role in a determination as to whether the record should be disclosed or redacted under the Public Records Law. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832 • Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Chief Paul Oliveira SPR24/2617 Page 2 September 30, 2024 municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Att’y for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response, a written good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. The Department’s September 16th Response In its September 16, 2024 response, the Department states, “[g]o thr[ough] 3rd [D]ist [C]ourt[.]” Based on the Department’s response, it is unclear whether the Department possesses records responsive to the request. The duty to comply with requests for records extends to those records that exist and are in the possession, custody, or control of the custodian of records at the time of the request. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a)(ii). If the Department does possess responsive records, it must either provide the records, or cite an exemption to the Public Records Law, and explain with specificity how such an exemption applies to withhold or redact the records. The Department must clarify this. Conclusion Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Ms. Raymond with a response to her request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law, and its Regulations within ten business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of the response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Rebecca Raymond