MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Colman Herman v. Boston, City of - Public Schools (SPR 20242712)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 09-30-2024

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20242712 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Colman Herman concerning records held by Boston, City of - Public Schools, opened 09-30-2024. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20242712
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Colman Herman
Custodian
Boston, City of - Public Schools
Date Opened
09-30-2024
Date Closed
10-11-2024

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records October 11, 2024 SPR24/2712 Shawn A. Williams, Esq. Director of Public Records City of Boston One City Hall Square Boston, MA 02201 Dear Attorney Williams: I have received the petition of Colman Herman appealing the response of the Boston Public Schools (School) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On August 6, 2024, Mr. Herman requested “…any and all bullying [reports] for school year 2023-2024 at the [School].” On August 23, 2024, the School provided a response, and assigned reference number R003348-081624 for tracking purposes. Unsatisfied with the School’s response, Mr. Herman petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR24/2712, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Shawn A. Williams, Esq. SPR24/2712 Page 2 October 11, 2024 If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. The School’s August 23rd response In its August 23, 2024 response, the School asserted, “[d]ue to the nature of your request additional time is needed. As such, the [School] will need up to, but no more than, fifteen (15) additional business days to review and process your request.” Current Appeal In his petition, Mr. Herman stated, “[o]n August 23, 2024 … the [School] stated that [it] will need fifteen more business days to process my request. Thus, the deadline for producing the responsive records was now September 10, 2024. That was nearly three weeks ago…” Timeliness in providing records G. L. c. 66, § 10(b) provides, in pertinent part, that if the magnitude or difficulty of the request unduly burdens the other responsibilities of the agency or municipality such that the agency or municipality cannot provide records within 10 business days, the agency or municipality must inform the requestor in writing within 10 business days. With respect to the timeframe to produce responsive records, the written response shall: identify a reasonable timeframe in which the agency or municipality shall produce the public records sought; provided, that for an agency, the timeframe shall not exceed 15 business days following the initial receipt of the request for public records and for a municipality the timeframe shall not exceed 25 business days following the initial receipt of the request for public records; and provided further, that the requestor may voluntarily agree to a response date beyond the timeframes set forth herein. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vi). Where Mr. Herman submitted his request on August 6, 2024, and the School has not provided responsive records, nor cited an exemption for withholding records, I find the School has not met its burden in responding to the request in accordance with G. L. c. 66, § 10(b). Consequently, the School must provide an estimated date as to when it intends to complete the search and provide the responsive records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a) (records must be provided without unreasonable delay). To the extent possible, the School must provide responsive records on a rolling basis. Conclusion Accordingly, the School is ordered to provide Mr. Herman with a response to his request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations

Shawn A. Williams, Esq. SPR24/2712 Page 3 October 11, 2024 within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of the response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Mr. Herman may appeal the substantive nature of the School’s response within 90 days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Colman Herman