MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Jason Forgue v. Chester, Town of - Town Clerk (SPR 20242883)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency must provide records · Filed 10-21-2024

ClosedFee PetitionPetitioner Won

SPR 20242883 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Jason Forgue concerning records held by Chester, Town of - Town Clerk, opened 10-21-2024. Type: Fee Petition. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency must provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20242883
Case Type
Fee Petition
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Jason Forgue
Custodian
Chester, Town of - Town Clerk
Date Opened
10-21-2024
Date Closed
10-24-2024

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records October 24, 2024 SPR24/2883 Terry Donovan Town Clerk Town of Chester 15 Middlefield Road Chester, MA 01011 Dear Terry Donovan: On October 21, 2024, this office received your petition on behalf of the Town of Chester (Town) seeking a waiver of statutory limits to fees that may be assessed in responding to the request. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4). As required by law, it is my understanding that the Town furnished a copy of the petition to the requestor, Jason Forgue. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv)(2). On May 7, 2024, Mr. Forgue requested “[a]ny/all email communications to/from [two identified individuals] from the last 12 months through today. Information to be provided in digital format to email address above...[t]his request includes all deleted emails as well.” Subsequently, on May 15, 2024, Mr. Forgue clarifies that he is seeking all emails to and from each of the identified individuals during thee specified time period. Prior Appeals This request was the subject of prior appeals. See SPR24/1959 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (July 17, 2024) and SPR24/2718 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (October 11, 2024). In my October 11th determination, I found that the Town must revise its fee estimate or provide further explanation of how the fees assessed are consistent with G. L. c. 66, § 10(d). Petition to assess fees – Municipalities The Supervisor may approve a petition from a municipality to charge for time spent segregating or redacting or to charge in excess of $25 per hour, if the Supervisor determines that 1) the request is for a commercial purpose or 2) the fee represents an actual and good faith representation by the municipality to comply with the request. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). In rendering such a decision, the Supervisor is required to consider the following: a) the One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Terry Donovan SPR24/2883 Page 2 October 24, 2024 public interest served by limiting the cost of public access to the records; b) the financial ability of the requestor to pay the additional or increased fees; and c) any other relevant extenuating circumstances. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). The statute sets out a two-prong test for determining whether the Supervisor may approve a municipality’s petition to allow the municipality to charge for time spent segregating or redacting records or to charge in excess of $25 an hour for the provision of public records. The first prong is whether the request for records was made for a commercial purpose. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). It is my understanding that this request was not made for a commercial purpose. The second prong of the test is whether the fee represents an actual and good faith representation by the municipality to comply with the request. The Supervisor must consider 1) if the fee is necessary such that the request could not have been prudently completed without the redaction or segregation or fee in excess of $25 per hour; 2) the amount of the fee is reasonable; and 3) the fee is not designed to limit, deter or prevent access to requested public records. Id. Petitions seeking a waiver of statutory limits to fees assessed to segregate and/or redact public records must be made within ten business days after receipt of a request for public records. 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4)(g). Fee Estimates – Municipalities A municipality may assess a reasonable fee for the production of a public record except those records that are freely available for public inspection. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d). The fees must reflect the actual cost of complying with a particular request. Id. A maximum fee of five cents ($.05) per page may be assessed for a black and white single or double-sided photocopy of a public record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(i). Municipalities may not assess a fee for the first 2 (two) hours of employee time to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce the record or records requested unless the municipality has 20,000 people or less. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iii). Where appropriate, municipalities may include as part of the fee an hourly rate equal to or less than the hourly rate attributed to the lowest paid employee who has the necessary skill required to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce a record requested, but the fee shall not be more than $25 per hour. Id. However, municipalities may charge more than $25 per hour if such rate is approved by the Supervisor of Records under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). A fee shall not be assessed for time spent segregating or redacting records unless such segregation or redaction is required by law or approved by the Supervisor of Records under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). See G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iii); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4).

Terry Donovan SPR24/2883 Page 3 October 24, 2024 Conclusion The Town submitted its petition on October 21, 2024, more than ten business days after receipt of the request. In light of the fact that the Town has not demonstrated that it submitted a timely petition, permission to charge a fee in excess of $25.00 per hour cannot be granted. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4)(g). Further, this office encourages Mr. Forgue and the Town to continue to communicate to facilitate providing records more efficiently and affordably. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vii)(a) municipality or agency shall suggest a reasonable modification of the scope of the request or offer to assist the requestor to modify the scope of the request if doing so would enable the municipality or agency to produce records sought more efficiently and affordably). When preparing a fee estimate for the provision of the requested records, the Town is advised to provide a detailed explanation to the requestor indicating why the estimated amount of time is necessary. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv) (requiring the amount of the fee must be reasonable). The Town must provide a response to Mr. Forgue within five business days of receipt of this determination. See 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4)(h)(4). Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Jason Forgue Thomas A. Mullen, Esq., Law Offices of Thomas A. Mullen, P.C.