← Back to Search
Joan P. Beckta v. Everett, City of - Solicitor's Office (SPR 20250391)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 02-10-2025
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20250391 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Joan P. Beckta concerning records held by Everett, City of - Solicitor's Office, opened 02-10-2025. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20250391
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Joan P. Beckta
- Date Opened
- 02-10-2025
- Date Closed
- 02-25-2025
- Date Request Submitted
- 01-16-2025
- Response Provided Date
- 02-04-2025
- Processing Fees Charged
- 0.00
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records February 25, 2025 SPR25/0391 Colleen M. Mejia, Esq. City Solicitor City of Everett 484 Broadway Everett, MA 02149 Dear Attorney Mejia: I have received the petition of Joan P. Beckta appealing the response of the City of Everett (City) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On January 17, 2025, Ms. Beckta requested, “[t]he minutes for the Charter Review Commission for June, July, 2 in Sept., Oct. and Dec. 2024….” The City responded on February 4, 2025, providing records responsive to the request. Unsatisfied with the City’s response and claiming the City possesses additional responsive records, Ms. Beckta appealed, and this case, SPR25/0391, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Att’y for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832 • Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Colleen M. Mejia, Esq. SPR25/0391 Page 2 February 25, 2025 provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. The City’s February 4th response In its February 4, 2025 response, the City provided records responsive to the request. Current Appeal In her appeal to this office, Ms. Beckta states, “I only asked for the Minutes that should have been done and submitted to the Commission for approval at the time of the request. They had a meeting on 1/9/2025 and another on 1/30/2025…. I only received June, July and Sept 5, 2024.” Subsequently, Ms. Beckta emailed this office on February 24, 2025 with a clarification that she is only seeking what is in her original request and not modifying her request to include additional records. The City is advised that the duty to comply with requests for records extends to those records that exist and are in the possession, custody, or control of the custodian of records at the time of the request. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a)(ii). Additionally, under the Public Records Law, a public employee is not required to answer questions, or do research, or create documents in response to questions. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a); 32 Op. Att’y Gen. 157, 165 (May 18, 1977). However, in accordance with the Public Records Law, custodians are expected to use their superior knowledge of the records in their custody to assist requestors in obtaining the desired information. See 950 C.M.R. 32.04(5). Based on the information provided in Ms. Beckta’s appeal petition, it is unclear whether the City possesses additional responsive records. The City must clarify this. Conclusion Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide Ms. Beckta with a response to her request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law, and its Regulations within ten business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of the response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Joan P. Beckta