Snook Law Office v. Littleton, Town of - Police Department (SPR 20250905)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records April 3, 2025 SPR25/0905 Kimberly Murphy Executive Assistant to the Chief of Police Littleton Police Department 500 Great Road Littleton, MA 021460 Dear Ms. Murphy: On April 2, 2025, this office received your petition on behalf of the Littleton Police Department (Department) seeking permission to waive statutory limits to fees and to charge for time spent segregating or redacting responsive records. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c); G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4). As required by law, it is my understanding that the Department furnished a copy of the petition to the requestor, Snook Law Office (requestor). G. L. c. 66, § 10(c); G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv)(2). In separate requests on March 24, 2025 and April 1, 2025, the requestor sought the following records for the period of March 16, 2025 through March 29, 2025 “[a]ll Motor Vehicle Crash reports concerning any motor vehicle accidents which occurred in your jurisdiction.” Petition to assess fees – Municipalities The Supervisor may approve a petition from a municipality to charge for time spent segregating or redacting or to charge in excess of $25 per hour, if the Supervisor determines that 1) the request is for a commercial purpose or 2) the fee represents an actual and good faith representation by the municipality to comply with the request. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). In rendering such a decision, the Supervisor is required to consider the following: a) the public interest served by limiting the cost of public access to the records; b) the financial ability of the requestor to pay the additional or increased fees; and c) any other relevant extenuating circumstances. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). The statute sets out a two-prong test for determining whether the Supervisor may approve a municipality’s petition to allow the municipality to charge for time spent segregating or redacting records or to charge in excess of $25 an hour for the provision of public records. The One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Kimberly Murphy SPR25/0905 Page 2 April 3, 2025 first prong is whether the request for records was made for a commercial purpose. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). The second prong of the test is whether the fee represents an actual and good faith representation by the municipality to comply with the request. The Supervisor must consider 1) if the fee is necessary such that the request could not have been prudently completed without the redaction or segregation or fee in excess of $25 per hour; 2) the amount of the fee is reasonable; and 3) the fee is not designed to limit, deter or prevent access to requested public records. Id. Petitions seeking a waiver of statutory limits to fees assessed to segregate and/or redact public records must be made within ten business days after receipt of a request for public records. 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4)(g). Fee Estimates – Municipalities A municipality may assess a reasonable fee for the production of a public record except those records that are freely available for public inspection. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d). The fees must reflect the actual cost of complying with a particular request. Id. A maximum fee of five cents ($.05) per page may be assessed for a black and white single or double-sided photocopy of a public record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(i). Municipalities may not assess a fee for the first 2 (two) hours of employee time to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce the record or records requested unless the municipality has 20,000 people or less. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iii). Where appropriate, municipalities may include as part of the fee an hourly rate equal to or less than the hourly rate attributed to the lowest paid employee who has the necessary skill required to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce a record requested, but the fee shall not be more than $25 per hour. Id. However, municipalities may charge more than $25 per hour if such rate is approved by the Supervisor of Records under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). A fee shall not be assessed for time spent segregating or redacting records unless such segregation or redaction is required by law or approved by the Supervisor of Records under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). See G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iii); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4). Current Petition In its petition, the Department requests to charge fees for segregation and redaction of the responsive records at a rate of $32.66 per hour. Commercial Purpose In its April 2nd petition, the Department stated, “[i]n furtherance of this petition, we further state that the request is for a commercial purpose and/or the fee represents an actual and good faith representation to comply with the request...”

Kimberly Murphy SPR25/0905 Page 2 April 3, 2025 Subsequent to the opening of this petition, in an email to the requestor and this office on April 3, 2025, the Department provided the following additional information in support of its assertion that the request was made for a commercial purpose: It is in [the Department’s] experience that public records requests for all accidents/reports within a time period, rather than with a client’s name and date of the accident, are being used for commercial purposes. If the requester was looking to obtain a report for a specific client, they would not need all reports for a week of time. With this blanket request, two weeks in a row for a specific period of time for all accident reports in our jurisdiction, I am confident that the request is for commercial purposes. This data being requested can be used to expand the Snook Law Office business and clientele base by receiving access to accident victims information. Based on the Department’s petition, it is my understanding that the requests made by the requestor meet the statutory definition of “commercial purpose” within the Public Records Law. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(ix); see also SPR20/2599 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (January 5, 2021). Conclusion Based on the Department’s petition and my finding that the requests were made for a commercial purpose, I approve the Department’s fee petition. Accordingly, the Department may assess a fee for segregation and redaction limited to $32.66 per hour. Please note, the requestor has the right to seek judicial review of this decision by commencing a civil action in the appropriate superior court. See G. L. c. 66, §§ 10A(c). Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Snook Law Office