← Back to Search
Joanne Wheeler v. Wellesley, Town of - Public Schools (SPR 20250907)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Public records appeal decision · Filed 04-02-2025
ClosedFee PetitionDecision
SPR 20250907 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Joanne Wheeler concerning records held by Wellesley, Town of - Public Schools, opened 04-02-2025. Type: Fee Petition. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Public records appeal decision.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20250907
- Case Type
- Fee Petition
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Joanne Wheeler
- Custodian
- Wellesley, Town of - Public Schools
- Date Opened
- 04-02-2025
- Date Closed
- 04-04-2025
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records April 4, 2025 SPR25/0907 Sharon Gray Records Access Officer Wellesley Public Schools 40 Kingsbury Street Wellesley, MA 02481 Dear Ms. Gray: On April 2, 2025, this office received your petition on behalf of Wellesley Public Schools (School) seeking permission to charge for time spent segregating or redacting responsive records. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c); G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4). As required by law, it is my understanding that the School furnished a copy of the petition to the requestor, Joanne Wheeler. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c); G. L.c. 66, § 10(d)(iv)(2). On March 19, 2025, Ms. Wheeler requested, “…emails written by [an identified individual] that mention the employee . . . between August 2023 and February 2024.” Petition to Assess Fees – Municipalities The Supervisor of Records (Supervisor) may approve a petition from a municipality to charge for time spent segregating or redacting or to charge in excess of $25 per hour, if the Supervisor determines that 1) the request is for a commercial purpose or 2) the fee represents an actual and good faith representation by the municipality to comply with the request. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). In rendering such a decision, the Supervisor is required to consider the following: a) the public interest served by limiting the cost of public access to the records; b) the financial ability of the requestor to pay the additional or increased fees; and c) any other relevant extenuating circumstances. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). The statute sets out a two-prong test for determining whether the Supervisor may approve a municipality’s petition to allow the municipality to charge for time spent segregating or redacting records. The first prong is whether the request for records was made for a commercial purpose. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). It is my determination that this request was not made for a commercial purpose. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Sharon Gray SPR25/0907 Page 2 April 4, 2025 The second prong of the test is whether the fee represents an actual and good faith representation by the municipality to comply with the request. The Supervisor must consider 1) if the fee is necessary such that the request could not have been prudently completed without the redaction or segregation or fee in excess of $25 per hour; 2) the amount of the fee is reasonable; and 3) the fee is not designed to limit, deter or prevent access to requested public records. Id. Fee Estimates – Municipalities A municipality may assess a reasonable fee for the production of a public record except those records that are freely available for public inspection. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d). The fees must reflect the actual cost of complying with a particular request. Id. A maximum fee of five cents ($.05) per page may be assessed for a black and white single or double-sided photocopy of a public record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(i). Municipalities may not assess a fee for the first 2 (two) hours of employee time to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce the record or records requested unless the municipality has 20,000 people or less. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iii). Where appropriate, municipalities may include as part of the fee an hourly rate equal to or less than the hourly rate attributed to the lowest paid employee who has the necessary skill required to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce a record requested, but the fee shall not be more than $25 per hour. Id. However, municipalities may charge more than $25 per hour if such rate is approved by the Supervisor of Records under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). A fee shall not be assessed for time spent segregating or redacting records unless such segregation or redaction is required by law or approved by the Supervisor of Records under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). See G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iii); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4). Current Petition In its petition, the School requests “the ability to charge fees for segregation and redaction of records pursuant to 950 CMR 32.06(4)(g) and (h).” In support of its petition, the School provides the following information: Ms. Wheeler is requesting emails of WPS’s Human Resources Director . . . that mention a prior teacher. . . . As such, the information may fall within Exemption (c) to the Public Records Law, which permits the withholding of personnel information and other personal information pertaining to employees that may not be available elsewhere and may result in an invasion of privacy to individuals. Additionally, information contained in the records may contain information protected under Exemption (a) to the Public Records Law. WPS is an educational agency subject to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and Massachusetts student records laws. The records may contain personally identifiable information of students that WPS is prohibited by law from releasing to the public. Sharon Gray SPR25/0907 Page 3 April 4, 2025 In light of the School’s petition, I find the School has met its burden to explain how, given the nature of the responsive records, the request could not prudently be completed without redaction or segregation. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). To the extent the responsive records contain the exempt information as described above, the School may assess a fee for the segregation and redaction of such exempt material. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). Conclusion Accordingly, to the extent the responsive records contain the exempt information as described above, the School may assess a fee for segregation and redaction. Further, I encourage the parties to communicate further to enable the School to provide records in an efficient and affordable manner. Please note, Ms. Wheeler has the right to seek judicial review of this decision by commencing a civil action in the appropriate superior court. See G. L. c. 66, §§ 10(c), 10(d)(iv)(4), 10A(c). Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Joanne Wheeler