MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Geoff Beach v. Acton, Town of - Town Clerk (SPR 20250951)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 04-07-2025

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20250951 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Geoff Beach concerning records held by Acton, Town of - Town Clerk, opened 04-07-2025. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20250951
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Geoff Beach
Custodian
Acton, Town of - Town Clerk
Date Opened
04-07-2025
Date Closed
04-09-2025
Date Request Submitted
03-20-2025
Response Provided Date
04-07-2025
Processing Fees Charged
0.00
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records April 9, 2025 SPR25/0951 Leo Mercado Town Clerk Town of Acton 472 Main Street Acton, MA 01720 Dear Mr. Mercado: I have received the petition of Geoff Beach appealing the response of the Town of Acton (Town) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On March 20, 2025, Mr. Beach requested the “… ‘Revised Plan II’… referenced in the Planning Board’s Opposition filed under Civil Action No. 2481CV2984 … included [sic] any and all supplementary documents incorporated into ‘Revised Plan II’, including but not limited to supporting drainage calculations.” The Town provided responses on April 3 and 5, 2025. Unsatisfied with the responses, Mr. Beach petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR25/0951, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Att’y for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Leo Mercado SPR25/0951 Page 2 April 9, 2025 If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. The Town’s April 3rd and 5th Responses In its April 3, 2025 response, the Town informed Mr. Beach that it expected to produce responsive records no later than April 7, 2025. In its April 5, 2025 response, the Town provided Mr. Beach with responsive records. Current Appeal In his April 7, 2025 petition to this office, Mr. Beach stated, “[I] explicitly sought a subdivision plan referred to as ‘Revised Plan II’ [approved in November 2022] … the Town provided only a document titled ‘As-built Stormwater Management Report,’ dated November 7, 2023 …” Based on Mr. Beach’s appeal and the Town’s response, it is unclear if the Town possesses any additional records responsive to the request. The duty to comply with requests for records extends to those records that exist and are in the possession, custody, or control of the custodian of records at the time of the request. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a)(ii). Custodians are expected to use their superior knowledge of the records in their custody to assist requestors in obtaining the desired information. See 950 C.M.R. 32.04(5). Consequently, the Town must clarify whether any additional responsive records exist. Conclusion Accordingly, the Town is ordered to provide Mr. Beach with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law, and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of the response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Mr. Beach may appeal the substantive nature of the Town’s response within ninety days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Geoff Beach