Julie Ahern v. Watertown, City of (SPR 20251320)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records May 14, 2025 SPR25/1320 Noelle Gilligan City Clerk City of Watertown 149 Main Street Watertown, MA 02472 Dear Ms. Gilligan: I have received the petition of Julie Ahern, Esq. appealing the response of the City of Watertown (City) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On April 26, 2025, Attorney Ahern requested: [A] copy of the specific sections of the Water Rules and Regulations that authorize Watertown’s aforementioned “mandatory” [water meter installation] and [service] interruption/shut off. If the delivered Water Regulations sections refer to additional sources of Watertown’s legal authority, please also deliver to me by USPS First class mail copies of these specific sections. Prior Appeal A similar request was the subject of a prior appeal. See SPR25/0571 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (March 3, 2025). In my March 3rd determination, I found that the City had provided Attorney Ahern with all responsive records in its possession. The City responded on April 30, 2025. Unsatisfied with the response, Attorney Ahern petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR25/1320, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Noelle Gilligan SPR25/1320 Page 2 May 14, 2025 municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. The City’s April 30th Response In its April 30, 2025 response, the City provided Attorney Ahern with a copy of its Water Regulations, noting that it had done so previously in response to a prior request. Current Appeal In her May 9, 2025 petition to this office, Attorney Ahern contended that the City had failed to adequately respond to her request, which sought only the sections of the Water Regulations related to the mandatory installation of water meters and the interruption or cancellation of services. No Duty to Conduct Research or Create Records Please be advised, under the Public Records Law a custodian is not required to create a record in response to a public records request. See. In addition, a public employee is not required to answer questions, or do research, or create documents in response to questions. See 32 Op. Att’y Gen. 157, 165 (May 18, 1977). The duty to comply with requests for records extends only to those records that exist and are in the possession, custody, or control of the custodian of records at the time of the request. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a)(ii). Where Attorney Ahern has requested that the City conduct research on her behalf, I find that the City has no duty under the Public Records Law to conduct such research. Conclusion Accordingly, I will now consider this administrative appeal closed. If Attorney Ahern is not satisfied with the resolution of this administrative appeal, please be advised that this office shares jurisdiction with the Superior Court of the Commonwealth. See G. L. c. 66, §§ 10(b)(ix), 10A(c) (pursuing administrative appeal does not limit availability of judicial remedies).

Noelle Gilligan SPR25/1320 Page 3 May 14, 2025 Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Julie Ahern, Esq.