← Back to Search
Vell Lord v. South Hadley, Town of - Police Department (SPR 20252030)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 07-14-2025
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20252030 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Vell Lord concerning records held by South Hadley, Town of - Police Department, opened 07-14-2025. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20252030
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Vell Lord
- Date Opened
- 07-14-2025
- Date Closed
- 07-24-2025
- Date Request Submitted
- 06-05-2025
- Response Provided Date
- 06-06-2025
- Processing Fees Charged
- 0.00
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records July 24, 2025 SPR25/2030 Kimberly Ottomaniello Administrative Assistant South Hadley Police Department 41 Bridge Street South Hadley, MA 01075 Dear Ms. Ottomaniello: I have received the petition of Vell Lord appealing the response of the South Hadley Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66 § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On June 5, 2025, Vell Lord requested, “209 domestic report made with [an identified individual].” The Department provided a response on June 6, 2025. Unsatisfied with the Department’s response, Vell Lord petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR25/2030, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Att’y for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response, a written good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Kimberly Ottomaniello SPR25/2030 Page 2 July 24, 2025 custodian must provide the responsive records. The Department’s June 6th Response In its June 6, 2025 response, the Department states that it has withheld certain records pursuant to Exemption (a) of the Public Records Law. See G. L. c. 4, § 7(26)(a). Exemption (a) Exemption (a), known as the statutory exemption, permits the withholding of records that are: specifically or by necessary implication exempted from disclosure by statute G. L. c. 4, § 7(26)(a). A governmental entity may use the statutory exemption as a basis for withholding requested materials where the language of the exempting statute relied upon expressly or necessarily implies that the public’s right to inspect records under the Public Records Law is restricted. See Att’y Gen. v. Collector of Lynn, 377 Mass. 151, 154 (1979); Ottaway Newspapers, Inc. v. Appeals Court, 372 Mass. 539, 545-546 (1977). This exemption creates two categories of exempt records. The first category includes records that are specifically exempt from disclosure by statute. Such statutes expressly state that such a record either “shall not be a public record,” “shall be kept confidential” or “shall not be subject to the disclosure provision of the Public Records Law.” The second category under the exemption includes records deemed exempt under statute by necessary implication. Such statutes expressly limit the dissemination of particular records to a defined group of individuals or entities. A statute is not a basis for exemption if it merely lists individuals or entities to whom the records are to be provided; the statute must expressly limit access to the listed individuals or entities. Under Exemption (a), the Department states, “[t]he report you are requesting is protected by public record law. The only person that can receive a copy is the victim. Your request is being denied in accordance with Massachusetts Public Records Law exemption (a)[.] Domestic Violence reports are prohibited. All domestic violence reports and associated documents can only be released to the victim.” Based on the Department’s response, it is unclear what statute the Department is claiming to withhold responsive records. The Department is reminded that for Exemption (a) to apply, the Department must cite a statute and said statute must either expressly state that the withheld record is not subject to disclosure under the Public Records Law, or limit dissemination of said information to a defined group or individual or entities. Consequently, the Department must state Kimberly Ottomaniello SPR25/2030 Page 3 July 24, 2025 the statute that permits it to withhold the records from disclosure. Conclusion Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide a response to Vell Lord, in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law, and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of the response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Vell lord