MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Andrew Ryan v. Tyngsborough, Town of - Police Department (SPR 20253511)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency must provide records · Filed 11-26-2025

ClosedTime PetitionPetitioner Won

SPR 20253511 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Andrew Ryan concerning records held by Tyngsborough, Town of - Police Department, opened 11-26-2025. Type: Time Petition. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency must provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20253511
Case Type
Time Petition
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Andrew Ryan
Custodian
Tyngsborough, Town of - Police Department
Date Opened
11-26-2025
Date Closed
12-04-2025

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records December 4, 2025 SPR25/3511 Lauren Page Public Safety Administrative Assistant Tyngsborough Police Department 20 Westford Road Tyngsborough, MA 01879 Dear Ms. Page: On November 26, 2025, this office received your petition on behalf of the Tyngsborough Police Department (Department) seeking an extension of time to produce records. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c); G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4). As required by law, I understand that the Department furnished a copy of this petition to the requestor, Andrew Ryan, of the Boston Globe. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c); G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv)(2). On October 16, 2025, Mr. Ryan requested, “digital copies of [three identified] cases[.]” Petitions for an Extension of Time Under the Public Records Law, upon a showing of good cause, the Supervisor of Records (Supervisor) may grant a single extension to an agency not to exceed 20 business days and a single extension to a municipality not to exceed 30 business days. In determining whether there has been a showing of good cause, the Supervisor shall consider, but shall not be limited to considering: (i) the need to search for, collect, segregate or examine records; (ii) the scope of redaction required to prevent unlawful disclosure; (iii) the capacity or the normal business hours of operation of the agency or municipality to produce the request without the extension; (iv) efforts undertaken by the agency or municipality in fulfilling the current request and previous requests; (v) whether the request, either individually or as part of a series of requests from the same requestor, is frivolous or intended to harass or intimidate the agency or municipality; and (vi) the public interest served by expeditious disclosure. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832 • Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Lauren Page SPR25/3511 Page 2 December 4, 2025 G. L. c. 66, § 10(c). If the Supervisor determines that the request is part of a series of contemporaneous requests that are frivolous or designed to intimidate or harass, and the requests are not intended for the broad dissemination of information to the public about actual or alleged government activity, the Supervisor may grant a longer extension or relieve the agency or municipality of its obligation to provide copies of the records sought. Id. The filing of a petition does not affect the requirement that a Records Access Officer (RAO) shall provide an initial response to a requestor within ten business days after receipt of a request for public records. 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4)(b). Conclusion The Department submitted its petition on November 26, 2025, more than twenty business days after receipt of the request. In light of the fact the Department has not demonstrated it submitted a timely petition, an extension of time cannot be granted. 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4)(d). To the extent possible, the Department must provide responsive records on a rolling basis. Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Andrew Ryan