MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Lane, Andrew v. Boston, City of - Police Department (SPR 20260359)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Public records appeal decision · Filed 02-03-2026

ClosedAppeal

SPR 20260359 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Lane, Andrew concerning records held by Boston, City of - Police Department, opened 02-03-2026. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed.

Case Details

Case Number
20260359
Case Type
Appeal
Status
Closed
Requester
Lane, Andrew
Custodian
Boston, City of - Police Department
Date Opened
02-03-2026
Date Closed
02-11-2026

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records February 11, 2026 SPR26/0359 Christine O’Donnell, Esq. Records Access Officer Boston Police Department 1 City Hall Square Boston, MA 02201 Dear Attorney O’Donnell: I have received the petition of Andrew Lane, of Hamel Marcin Dunn Reardon & SHEA, P.C., appealing the response of the Boston Police Department (Department/BPD) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On November 26, 2025, Mr. Lane requested “[b]ody camera footage from [three identified officers] for the July 20, 2025 incident that occurred at Alford St and Dexter St in Charlestown, MA. Incident Report # 252058791.” The Department responded on November 26, 2025 and December 27, 2025, and assigned reference number R006450-112625 to this request. Unsatisfied with the Department’s responses, Mr. Lane petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR26/0359, was opened as a result. Subsequent to the opening of this appeal, the Department provided a further response on February 3, 2026. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Christine O’Donnell, Esq. SPR26/0359 Page 2 February 11, 2026 must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. The Department’s November 26th and December 27th Responses On November 26, 2025, the Department acknowledged receipt and assigned reference number R006450-112625 to this request. On December 27, 2025, the Department stated, “[d]ue to the nature of your request additional time is needed. As such, BPD will need up to, but no more than, fifteen (15) additional business days to review and process your request.” On February 3, 2026, the Department released one record. Current Appeal In response, Mr. Lane stated “I’m not seeing the files on the public records center page. The only file there is a .png image of our company’s logo.” Timeliness in Providing Records G. L. c. 66, § 10(b) provides, in pertinent part, that if the magnitude or difficulty of the request unduly burdens the other responsibilities of the agency or municipality such that the agency or municipality cannot provide records within 10 business days, the agency or municipality must inform the requestor in writing within 10 business days. With respect to the timeframe to produce responsive records, the written response shall: identify a reasonable timeframe in which the agency or municipality shall produce the public records sought; provided, that for an agency, the timeframe shall not exceed 15 business days following the initial receipt of the request for public records and for a municipality the timeframe shall not exceed 25 business days following the initial receipt of the request for public records; and provided further, that the requestor may voluntarily agree to a response date beyond the timeframes set forth herein. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vi). Where Mr. Lane submitted his request on November 26th, and the Department has not provided responsive records, nor cited an exemption for withholding records, I find the Department has not met its burden in responding to the request in accordance with G. L. c. 66, §

Christine O’Donnell, Esq. SPR26/0359 Page 3 February 11, 2026 10(b). Consequently, the Department must provide an estimated date as to when it intends to complete the search and provide the responsive records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a) (records must be provided without unreasonable delay). Conclusion Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Mr. Lane with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of the response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Mr. Lane may further appeal the substantive nature of the Department’s response within ninety (90) days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Andrew Lane