MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Brenes, Amberlie v. Massachusetts State Police (SPR 20260386)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Public records appeal decision · Filed 02-04-2026

ClosedAppeal

SPR 20260386 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Brenes, Amberlie concerning records held by Massachusetts State Police, opened 02-04-2026. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed.

Case Details

Case Number
20260386
Case Type
Appeal
Status
Closed
Requester
Brenes, Amberlie
Custodian
Massachusetts State Police
Date Opened
02-04-2026
Date Closed
02-12-2026

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records February 12, 2026 SPR26/0386 Allison Mondello Public Records Manager Department of State Police 50 Maple Street Milford, MA 01757 Dear Ms. Mondello: I have received the petition of Amberlie Brenes, of Altman Nussbaum Shunnarah Trial Attorneys, appealing the response of the Department of State Police (Department) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66 § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On September 30, 2025, Ms. Brenes requested, “the police report of the accident [for an identified individual].” The Department provided a response on September 30, 2025 and January 8, 2026. Unsatisfied with the Department’s responses, Ms. Brenes petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR26/0386, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Allison Mondello SPR26/0386 Page 2 February 12, 2026 If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. The Department’s September 30th and January 8th Responses In its September 30, 2025 response, the Department acknowledged receipt of the request, assigning it reference number P010463-093025. In its January 8, 2026 response, the Department stated, “[p]lease be advised the Public Records Unit processes requests in the order they are received. Due to the high volume of requests we receive daily, we have not yet had a chance to process your request…” Current Appeal In her February 4, 2026 petition to this office, Ms. Brenes stated, “[w]e have submitted this request for a police report on September 30, 2025, but have not received any response or records to our request.” Timeframe for Providing Records G. L. c. 66, § 10(b) provides, in pertinent part, that if the magnitude or difficulty of a request unduly burdens the other responsibilities of the agency or municipality such that the agency or municipality cannot provide records within 10 business days, the agency or municipality must inform the requestor in writing within 10 business days. With respect to the timeframe to produce responsive records, the written response shall: identify a reasonable timeframe in which the agency or municipality shall produce the public records sought; provided, that for an agency, the timeframe shall not exceed 15 business days following the initial receipt of the request for public records and for a municipality the timeframe shall not exceed 25 business days following the initial receipt of the request for public records; and provided further, that the requestor may voluntarily agree to a response date beyond the timeframes set forth herein. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vi). Where Ms. Brenes submitted her request on September 30, 2025, and the Department has not provided responsive records, I find the Department has not met its burden in responding to the request in accordance with G. L. c. 66, § 10(b). Consequently, the Department must provide an estimated date as to when it intends to complete the search and provide the responsive records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a) (records must be provided without unreasonable delay).

Allison Mondello SPR26/0386 Page 3 February 12, 2026 Conclusion Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Ms. Brenes with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law, and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of the response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Ms. Brenes may appeal the substantive nature of the Department’s response within ninety days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Amberlie Brenes