← Back to Search
Recon, Urban v. Lowell, City of - Police Department (SPR 20261037)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Public records appeal decision · Filed 03-23-2026
ClosedAppeal
SPR 20261037 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Recon, Urban concerning records held by Lowell, City of - Police Department, opened 03-23-2026. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20261037
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Recon, Urban
- Custodian
- Lowell, City of - Police Department
- Date Opened
- 03-23-2026
- Date Closed
- 04-06-2026
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records April 6, 2026 SPR26/1037 Jacqueline Cook Records Access Officer Lowell Police Department 50 Arcand Drive Lowell, MA 01852 Dear Ms. Cook: I have received the petition of Urban Recon (requestor) appealing the response of the Lowell Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On December 4, 2025, the requestor sought “[a]ll available body- worn camera footage related to this arrest, including footage from every officer who responded, participated, or was present.” The Department responded on December 29, 2025 and February 9, 2026. Unsatisfied with the responses, the requestor petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR26/1037, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Jacqueline Cook SPR26/1037 Page 2 April 6, 2026 If there are any fees associated with a response, a written good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. The Department’s December 29th and February 9th Responses In its December 29, 2025 response, the Department provided a fee estimate of $50.00. Subsequently, the requestor paid the fees on January 29, 2026. In its February 9, 2026 response, the Department stated, “[w]e are still working diligently on your request. You will receive a separate email containing the link to the responsive BWC Videos approximately 10 days following the payment con know if you have any further questions.” [sic] Current Appeal In his March 23, 2026 appeal petition to this office, the requestor claimed that despite having paid the assessed fee, he had received no responsive records. Payment of Fees Under the Public Records Law, a records custodian is not required to produce responsive records until receipt of payment of a reasonable fee. G. L. c. 66, § 10(a)(iii). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. Where it appears the Department has received payment of the reasonable fee, the Department must provide the responsive records. To the extent possible, the Department must provide responsive records on a rolling basis. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a) (records must be provided without unreasonable delay). Conclusion Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide the requestor with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of the response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. The requestor may appeal the substantive nature of the Department’s response within ninety days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Urban Recon